In fact, one participant commented that this layout "was more difficult to see and reach than the others because of its height on the screen." It is possible that the distance this layout was from the center of the screen contributed to its poorer participant performance. Participants in this condition took longer to find the task information, and they had the opinion, though non-significantly, that this layout was more disorientating than the other two layouts. The poorest performer, both objectively and subjectively, was the Horizontal layout. A 2003 usability study showed that all menus are inferior to Yahoo-style index lists, and horizontal menus have the worst usability of all: A single "Start" point for the user is a fine idea, but it really starts to break down when you make it into more than a simple, visible list of items, as the All Programs link does. The deeper problem with the start menu is that it's, well, a menu. Or right-clicking an item to delete it, which sometimes results in the entire start menu closing. Try dragging an item from within a folder to another folder, for example. However, this is incredibly difficult to do within a series of cascading menus. If you want to rearrange the list of applications, you can do so by dragging the items in the menus.Once you have more than one "row" of applications, cascading folders that pop up from the left row obscure the information in the right row.Again- how is a user supposed to know this? That's because those items are set up for All Users. Some items show up at the top of the list for no obvious reason.It's set up with its own icon at the bottom of the list. If you're looking for Word under the Microsoft folder, or the Office folder, you're out of luck. These items show up at the bottom of the list. Why should we expect the user to know or care what the company name is? So if I want to use CrazyApp, I have to remember to look for the Monke圜orp menu. Software vendors tend to put their applications in folders using the name of their company. ![]() You can manually sort it by right clicking the list and selecting Sort. The list is not in alphabetical order by default.I curse every time I have to launch an app that isn't pinned to my start menu, or in the recently launched program list: A giant horizontal menu may have seemed like a good idea back when Windows 95 was launched- but clearly, it isn't. The Windows start menu makes launching applications far more difficult than it should be. I just happened to notice a theme in his posts that jibed with my personal experience. I'll know I'm done when the Start Menu completely fills my 1400x1050 screen. (October 10, 2003)Īnyway, I'm about 40% done installing my programs as you can see by my Start Menu. (May 11, 2003)Īs I sit here and look at my Start Menu, that fills my 1600x1200 screen and runs off the right edge. ![]() Personally I have enough crap in my start menu to fill my 1400x1060 screen.arguably only 30% of the icons represent applications, the rest are just flotsam. As I struggle to open applications on my PC, I was reminded of a few entries in Scott Hanselman's blog:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |